COURT - The word accusation.
ACCUSER - The accused is present here, Mr. Adam, is certainly guilty of theft! We the evidence in this regard. It was seen by a witness while carrying on his truck stolen crates of apples.
ADAMO - not true!
COURT - Silence!
ACCUSER - You've heard all the evidence .. He was robbed of a neighbor. He was looking at the window and saw it all ..
DEFENDER - I object. Has not really seen the accused.
ACCUSER - He acknowledged, however. It 's true, the thief has seen only from behind, not in the face. But I recognized Mr. Adam security. He recognized the dress I had and the way of move, because I know him well.
Defender - This is not conclusive evidence. It 'a presumption.
charge - the witness was reliable.
LAWYER - Imagine. However, even the defense produced a witness on his behalf. A friend of Mr. Adam testified that on the evening of the theft was at his house, across town, and that Mr Adam had been with him all evening until late.
charge - is a friend. They may have lied to friends.
LAWYER - No, he spoke under oath.
JUDGE - This is true.
LAWYER - It is evident that this alibi completely exonerates my client! Neither can be considered decisive evidence of the prosecution, since the recognition was not reliable. Therefore, Mr. Adam is definitely innocent, and should be acquitted for not having committed the crime.
JUDGE - Well, if you're finished I'm ready for decision.
DEFENDER - I'm through. And I am sure that the truth will be recognized.
charge - Even the prosecution finished. But I would like to remind Your Honor that in this case must apply the rule G.3, 14.
JUDGE - Ah, yes, it's true. Will consider them.
ADAM - What does this mean?
DEFENDER - I do not know. We'll see what the judge will say. For now we can do is wait.
COURT - This is the sentence. The accused is found guilty of Mr Adam stealing two boxes of apples.
ADAM - But I ....
JUDGE - in fact under rule G.3, 14 showed that the beginning of creation the founder of Mr. Adam, his namesake, was guilty of robbery and premeditated than an apple. So Mr. Adam also present here, Since his descendants, should be considered guilty in the same offense addebitatogli. The hearing was closed.
ADAM - I did not understand anything. I am innocent, but I have been convicted! Why? And what the rule G.3, 14, what does the math?
LAWYER - Mathematics has nothing to do, the villains have applied the rule of original sin: Chapter 3 verse 14 of Genesis.
ADAMO - they've got the Bible?
LAWYER - Exactly. And faced with a "logic" like this one, I just can not do anything.
0 comments:
Post a Comment